All except three of the papers in this volume were presented at the colloquium on "L'Ontologie formelle aujourd'hui", Geneva, 3-5 June 1988. The three exceptions, the papers by David Armstrong, Uwe Meixner and Wolfgang Lenzen, were presented at the colloquium on "Properties", Zinal, June 1-3, 1990. It was, incidentally, at the second of these two colloquia that the European Society for Analytic Philosophy came into being. The fathers of analytic philosophy - Moore and Russell - were in no doubt that (...) ontology or metaphysics as well as the topics oflanguage, truth and logic constituted the core subject-matter of their "analytic realism", 1 for the task of metaphysics as they conceived things was the description of 2 the world. And logic and ontology are indissolubly linked in the system of the grandfather of analytic philosophy, Frege. After the Golden Age of analytic philosophy - in Cambridge and Austria - opposition to realism as well as the "linguistic turn" contributed for a long time to the eclipse of ontology. 3 Thanks in large measure to the work of some of the senior contributors to the present volume - Roderick Chisholm, Herbert Hochberg, David Armstrong and Karel Lambert - ontology and metaphysics now enjoy once again the central position they occupied some eighty years ago in the heyday of analytic philosophy. (shrink)

Körner has made an important distinction between dependent and independent particulars, noting that any adequate theory of categories will divide particulars into those that are independent and those that are not. In the present paper, the concept of a spatial boundary is used to illustrate the concept of a dependent particular. It is suggested that, if we follow Brentano and think of such boundaries as ontologically dependent upon the things of which they may be said to be boundaries, then we (...) will be able to throw light upon a number of philosophical questions about the spatial continuum. These questions pertain to such topics as: the distinction between parts and boundaries; the definition of dimensionality; and the nature of contact and physical continuity. (shrink)

We first summarize and comment upon a 'calculus of intrinsic preferability' which we have presented in detail elsewhere. 1 Then we set forth 'the problem of supererogation' - a problem which, according to some, has presented difficulties for deontic logic. And, finally, we propose a moral or deontic interpretation of the calculus of intrinsic preferability which, we believe, enables us to solve the problem of supererogation.

I shall presuppose—but not here defend—three fundamental metaphysical theses. The first is that persons—such entities as ourselves—are substantival concrete things, in the strictest sense of the term “thing”, that persist through time, in the strictest sense of the expression “persist through time.” The second metaphysical thesis is that there are such entities as states of affairs, some of which occur, happen, obtain, or take place, and others of which do not occur, happen, obtain, or take place. And the third metaphysical (...) thesis is this: the fact that we are—occasionally, at least—morally responsible for what we do, implies that we are causes, that persons are causes. I shall comment briefly on this third thesis. (shrink)

Islam and Its Past: Jahiliyya, Late Antiquity, and the Qurʾan. Edited by Carol Bakhos and Michael Cook. Oxford Studies in the Abrahamic Religions. Oxford: oxford University Press, 2017. Pp. ix + 267. $85, £65.

The epistemological problem of individuation concerns the conditions under which we can individuate or identify particular things. I t is argued that these conditions presuppose that each of us can apprehend his own individual essence or haecceity. The metaphysical problem of individuation concerns the question: In virtue of what can it be said that two things which are counterparts of each other are two and not one? It is argued that here, too, we must appeal to the concept of an (...) individual essence or haecceity. The views presented here seem to be in accord with those of St. Thomas Aquinas. (shrink)

The epistemological problem of individuation concerns the conditions under which we can individuate or identify particular things. I t is argued that these conditions presuppose that each of us can apprehend his own individual essence or haecceity. The metaphysical problem of individuation concerns the question: In virtue of what can it be said that two things which are counterparts of each other are two and not one? It is argued that here, too, we must appeal to the concept of an (...) individual essence or haecceity. The views presented here seem to be in accord with those of St. Thomas Aquinas. (shrink)

SummaryA distinction is drawn between prima facie duties and absolute duties . It is noted that the epistemic concept of confirmation is similar in fundamental respects to that of requirement. Hence we can distinguish between saying of something that it is prima facie probable for a subject S and saying of it that it is absolutely probable for S. Other analogies between moral and epistemic reasoning are noted.RésuméUne distinction est etablie entre des devoirs prima facie et des devoirs absolus . (...) On notera que le concept épistémique de confirmation est fondamentale‐ment semblable à celui ?on;exigence. On peut done distinguer entre dire de quelque chose qu'elle est prima facie probable pour un sujet S et dire qu'elle est absolument probable pour S. ?on;autres analogies entre raisonnement moral et épistémique sont relevées.ZusammenfassungEs wird eine Unterscheidung gemacht zwischen prima facie Pflichten und absoluten Verpflichtungen . Es ist zu bemerken, dass der erkenntnistheoretische Begriff der Bestätigung in grundlegenden Beziehungen demjenigen der Forderung ähnlich ist. Wir können daher unterscheiden zwischen von etwas sagen, das es prima facie wahrscheinlich ist für ein Subjekt S uns sagen, dass es absolut wahrscheinlich ist für S. Es werden weitere Analogien zwischen moralischen und erkenntnistheoretischen Argumenten fest‐gehalten. (shrink)